This paper undertakes a comprehensive analysis of an article by David Nettle, dissecting the relationship between schizotypy, a mental condition, and individuals in creative fields such as literature, poetry, and visual arts. The analysis is structured into three main sections. First, it provides a summary of the key arguments and evidence presented in Nettle’s article. This includes the assertion that schizotypy is prevalent among creative individuals, and the historical connection between creativity and mental health. The paper examines the evidence Nettle presents, emphasizing the high levels of psychopathology, including depression and bipolar disorder, among creative professionals.
Second, the analysis evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of Nettle’s arguments and evidence. Strengths include the use of comprehensive questionnaires and the examination of schizotypy scales. However, potential weaknesses revolve around the representativeness of the survey participants and the method of data collection, which relied on questionnaires sent through mail or advertised on the internet. These methods may have led to self-selection bias and limited the diversity of the sample.
Lastly, the paper discusses the broader implications of Nettle’s article, particularly in the context of human consciousness and mental health issues. It recognizes the significance of understanding the various forms of psychopathology, highlighting the importance of patient education and support. Additionally, it delves into the concept of dependency and exploitation of vulnerable individuals, emphasizing the need for psychological support networks. Nettle’s research underscores the intricate relationship between creativity and mental health, paving the way for more informed and empathetic approaches to addressing these complex issues.
This paper aims at analyzing an article of David Nettle. The analysis of the article will be
done in different sections wherein the first section is about the summary of the article, the
second section is about the strengths & weaknesses of the article and thethird section is about
linking the article with mental and consciousness.
1) Concisely describe the main arguments and evidence presented by the paper
The article by David Nettle focuses on the fact that the condition of schizotypy is common
among people who belong to literature such as poets, visual artists etc. As per (), Schizotypy
is a theory which states that there is a continuum of personality characteristics and
experiences (Mason, 2015). He has mentioned in the article that there is along history of
relations between creativity and mental illness. The author has supported these speculations
with strong evidencefrom the past. The first evidence is that biographical and survey studies
have found that there are high levels of psychopathology in people who belong to fields of
literature or arts. The condition of psychopathology includes thesituation of depression and
bipolar disorder. There have been many such pieces of evidence put forward by David Nettle
in the article. However, the author emphasizes that there are numerous questions which have
still been unanswered (Sklar & Sklar, 2012). One such question is that whether healthy
creative people have any milder relation with the schizotypal traits than the people who suffer
from psychopathology. Is it also possible that the healthy people have an equal relation with
schizotypal traits or not. The current research has, primarily, focussed on the artistic
creativity while the position of other creative domains is not yet clear. An experiment has
been carried out by the author wherein the schizotypy profiles of the large sample of poets,
artists, mathematicians, general population and psychiatric patients using O Life inventory.
During the experiment, it was found out that the high levels of unusual experiences are for
pets and artists instead of schizophrenia patients. These people have alow level of unusual
experience. Also, mathematicians have low control on unusual experience. As per the
observations, it can be suggested that people belonging from literature or arts share a high
tendency to unusual experiences while the creative groups can be differentiated by the
absence of anhedonia and avolition (Haan et al., 2015). Also, distinct domains of creativity
require distinct cognitive profiles. The poets and arts people are associated with divergent
thinking, schizophrenia, and affective disorder while the mathematicians are associated with
convergent thinking and autism. Overall, the article is an evidence of the fact that there is a
strong link between vulnerability to psychopathology and creative groups. The artistic people
possess an unusual though process which symbolizes mild and severe psychopathology. The
scores received by creative people are as high as the people suffering from schizophrenia. On
the other hand, the mathematicians possess an opposite pattern as they have alow level of
schizotypy. However, creative people have also shown flattened affect and a violation which
are absent in mathematicians (Szasz, 2008). Therefore, it is true that mathematicians and
engineers do not show unusual behavior than creative groups and artistic people.
2) Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments and evidence presented
by the paper
The article by David Nettle has presented the fact that the artistic people possess an unusual
thought process which symbolizes mild and severe psychopathology and also the scores
received by the creative people are as high as the people suffering from schizophrenia. But
the mathematicians possess an opposite pattern as they have alow level of schizotypy. In the
article, the author has used a comprehensive questionnaire including O-Life schizotypy scales
(Waters & Stephane, 2014). The participants of the survey comprise of control participants,
visual artists,amathematician who have a long history of theserious mental disorder.
However, the author has not made any claim regarding the sample being representative of the
general population. Since the survey questionnaires were dropped through letters so there are
chances that many might not have considered them important to participate. The study was
also advertised on internet local events site for the same city. This was to facilitate people to
take part in the survey and record their responses. Thirdly, questionnaires were also given to
students attending residential schools in Psychology at Open University. The pack comprised
of a postage-paid envelope. This method of recording responses was, no doubt, quick and
easy but it involved few weaknesses also. Since thedoor to door handling of questionnaire
involved too much time and energy so the entire process seemed very time-consuming (Smith
& Haslam, 2012). Also, the questionnaires which were handed over to students were not very
appropriate since the students might not hand over them to their parents.
3) Summarize the ways in which the paper may contribute to a broad
understanding of the nature of human consciousness and mental health issues
This paper focuses on the fact that the condition of schizotypy is common among people who
belong to literature such as poets, visual artists etc. Also, there is along history of relations
between creativity and mental illness (Morey & Mueser, 2007). The experiment carried in the
study led to the conclusion that the creative groups also possess an unusual though process
which symbolizes mild and severe psychopathology. The scores received by creative people
are as high as the people suffering from schizophrenia. On the other hand, the mathematicians
possess an opposite pattern as they have alow level of schizotypy.
This clearly demonstrates that most people do suffer from some form of mental illness but
it’s critical to understand each group of psychopathology conditions. This makes it important
for the public to be educated regarding ways to deal with these psychopathology conditions,
patients may have some drawbacks or complications but also develop important skills (Jones-
Smith, 2013). David Nettle clearly discusses the different impressive skills the schizotypy
and schizophrenia patients develop but require certain working and interpersonal
relationships and boundaries to be developed.
Both conditions begin developing from a very young age and tend to re-enforce themselves in
the person's mind only to worsen over time. In many situations, the person suffering from the
condition will come to terms with their problems when it’s too late despite being warned by
people around them. While there may not be any way of determining or preventing the
progression of the psychopathology conditions, the patients will usually come to terms with
their conditions and thereafter seek medical care and treatment (Spaulding et al., 2003). This
is an important stage since this is a period when they feel confident in themselves, and now
they have the knowledge and capacity to undertake and perform a task independently. At this
time,theystill seek intervention and help but this also tends to be a critical period in their lives
since they are sensitive and need support.
In most situations they also tend to be attached to a person who is misusing this psychological
condition to their benefit and they will quickly retaliate to attempt making the individual
return under their dependency. In most situations spouses will be identified to misuse this
weakness to their advantage to misuse a person simply due to them being dependent on them
for support (Agrawal, 2013). It’s important for all people suffering from psychopathology
conditions to understand those closest to them could be their biggest enemies since they have
grown heavily dependent on them. This makes it critical that they avoid involving them to
their treatment plans and schedules unless they are very sure they offer proper support.
Schizotypy tends to be a condition where an individual gets confident in their ability after a
long time but this confidence and focus can be shattered in a matter of minutes.
A schizotypy patients focus may not be damaged by incidents that occur at work but more
likely to be triggered by a person they are close to. This makes taking certain steps very
important before seeking medical help and rehabilitation as these would help the person
retain focus on themselves. Taking steps like seeking employment and interacting with
people other than you close and trusted friend and partner are very important towards making
the transition (Mason & Claridge, 2015). While these psychopathology conditions cannot be
overcome or fully treated, rehabilitation can help deliver certain degrees of independence to
the individual and help build their confidence. While working and interacting with people
have been identified to be a major problem, patients suffering from most psychopathology
conditions tend to be exceptional performers at tasks they perform alone. This makes it
important for them to be guided intoperusing tasks where they mainly work on jobs
independently. This allows them to build confidence in their work and gradually grow more
dependent on their profession which is much more beneficial and less harmful to their
psychological state (Landy & Bradley, 2013).
Psychopathology conditions very, and while many people view patient as incompetent,
human conscious is deeper rooted (Beauchaine & Hinshaw, 2013). interactions with people
or societyand many will develop important unique skills linked to problem-solving. Many
patients suffering from psychopathology conditions develop a high level of intelligence
linked to certain areas of their interest. These skills and knowledgeshould then be exploited
by the responsible authorities to help the person grow independent. The patients tend to focus
extensive knowledge and abilities on this skill and fixate on the skills development. Most will
focus deeply on their skilldevelopment,and many people suffering from psychopathology
conditionseven findsolutions to very complex problems in their dreams (Garfield, 2005). This
is due to them placing considerable effort and focus towards their work and interests and this
can be used to help them reverse the problem during rehabilitation. Rehabilitation must be
limited and closely linked to their work, as this reduces the individual slipping backinto
dependency and hopelessness.
Psychopathology conditions have for a long time been misunderstood but recent technology
has helped identify a wide verity of conditions that most people suffer from without even
realizing they are sick. This makes it important for the public to be educated regarding
psychological conditions to help reduce the strain and pressure placed on people suffering
from acertain condition (Blaney & Millon, 2008). This results in them in being avoidant and
lacks confidence in themselvesregardless ofhaving lots of skill and abilities in the field.